A candidate revising for a certification knows exactly what to do: sit the paper, find the weak domain, sit it again. A team shipping a release knows exactly what to check: the login, the checkout, the headers, the contrast ratios, at phone size and again on desktop. Neither task is intellectually difficult. Both are abandoned constantly, because people run out of patience long before the work runs out.
That gap is what we build into. Software does not get bored, does not skip the boring third of the checklist on a Friday, and does not quietly stop recording the results when they become discouraging. Our job is to make the patient thing also the accurate thing, and then to get out of the way.
The name is the argument: Dev for the work, sapience for the judgement it takes to do the work well. Automation without judgement produces a great deal of output nobody trusts.